Hello?
Anyone there...?
((crickets))
Well. Can't say I blame you!
I've been absent for months...sorry!
The blog's been on a sort of unplanned hiatus while I've put my efforts into pursuing some writing-related jobs, and I'm happy to say that the time I invested has begun paying off. In addition to book reviews for ForeWord Reviews, I've been busy with several proofreading and copy editing projects for Skyhorse Publishing, a well-established and growing New York publisher. I've had a lot of fun working on a variety of titles for them, including a few cookbooks and memoirs as well as an anthology of really good horror stories.
I'm also happy to say that I've recently accepted a position as a Senior Editor for Entranced Publishing, and I'll be editing primarily for their Mesmerized and Thrills imprints. I'm very excited to become part of their editing team, and I'm impressed by their commitment to the success of the authors they represent.
(**And if you write romance and are ready to publish, check out the submission guidelines on their website, or feel free to contact me through this blog or email jeannine (at) entrancedpublishing.com, and I'll be glad to put you in touch with the right person to get you started.)
So...yeah.
Been a little bit busy! :)
That said, my old friends Biff and Mary have been clamoring for attention so I think I'll have to spend some time with them this weekend. For those still interested in Biff, Mary, Poopsie and friends, I am going to pick up where we left off, hopefully posting a new chapter by Sunday.
I'm also hoping to translate some of the things I've been learning to this blog, specifically with posts about muddling through the writing process, links to sites to help you enhance your skills, and maybe some more Biff and Mary type "projects" to keep things fun. If you'd like to join in or just share some good links or books or whatever, please do!
Again, apologies for the long absence and I hope you'll stick with me while I try to set this blog on a more focused course!
:)
Showing posts with label changes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label changes. Show all posts
Friday, July 19, 2013
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Books to Movies: Will it work for the Outlander books?
Apologies for such a long, unplanned hiatus from the blog.
For those of you who are still interested in their misadventures, Biff and Mary
have been clamoring for attention and will likely make an appearance again in
the very near future, so stay tuned!
There has been quite a lot of interesting stuff going on in
the writing/reading world these days, but the one that caught my
attention recently is an announcement about Diana Gabaldon’s Outlander books
being picked up by Starz for development as a drama series.
Am I the only Outlander fan who views this with at least a little bit of
wariness?
Oh, I understand the author’s willingness to make the deal –
really, if it were you, and you stood to make the kind of money such a
movie/series could bring in, would you ever turn it down? Of course not. You'd sign on and hope they did a good job.
But as a devoted reader of the series…
Please... just, no.
If there is any one novel I’ve read that I do *not* want to
see on film, Outlander is it.
Is there any actress who could truly portray
someone as complex as Claire? Any actor who could convincingly become Jamie?
Just
the thought of it gives me horrific visions of Keira Knightly wildly emoting
while Tom Cruise flips back a mop of artificial red hair. Yikes.
And when it comes to the whole books-to-movies-or-television thing, I would
venture to say that history supports my skepticism.
Consider all of the books you’ve truly enjoyed. Have any
been turned into a movie?
Or a television mini-series?
Take Stephen King, for example. He has a way of tapping into that
little spark of fear or strangeness in humanity that might otherwise go
unnoticed, and brilliantly twisting it into a nightmarish thing. Genius, really, and back
in the day, I loved reading Carrie, The Shining, and many others. And while the
movies based on those novels were entertaining, they certainly didn’t compare
to the books themselves. How could that kind of singular nuance of human nature and evil that
King captures so perfectly ever be sufficiently expressed by character actors
(even good ones like Jack Nicholson and Sissy Spacek)?
I haven’t read any of the Twilight books, and I don’t really
think I ever will, but from what I understand many of the book's fans were very unhappy about the movie casting, and felt that the action in the book didn’t translate
credibly to the big screen.
If a major movie studio can’t do something like the Twilight
series justice on the movie screen, can we really have much faith in Starz
being able to do a superior book series like Outlander justice?
Well.
Maybe I’m a “book snob” or maybe I’m a cynic, but I can’t
find it in me to be excited by that announcement. I love Jamie and Claire as
they exist on the pages, and in my mind, and I don’t want to see the Hollywood
version of them. I really don't.
How do the rest of you Outlander fans feel about it?
Do you think there is any possibility that Starz can do
something worthwhile with the book?
I'd welcome your opinions in the comments.
{* One more thing! For those
die-hard fans like me, I highly recommend Karen Henry’s Outlandish Observations
site. There’s a lot of great info about the books and the history, such as the
Friday Fun Facts, and lots of other fun and informative Outlander stuff. If you
haven’t been there, it’s definitely worth a visit!}
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Another Adventure Begins...
I am very pleased and excited to announce that my proofreading service is up and running and ready to book assignments!
The Practical Pen
Proofreading Services for the Pragmatic Writer
I am offering proofreading services for everything from manuscripts to professional marketing materials and resumes. Rates are set at a very affordable level, and I am currently offering a 10% discount for all projects booked by May 31, 2012.
Thank you for indulging me in a little self-promotion here, and I hope you will take a moment to check out my new website at www.thepracticalpen.com. It's still evolving, but most information is there and any comments/feedback would be welcome!
Have a great weekend! :)
Image courtesy of freedigitalphotos.net
Sunday, March 4, 2012
The More Things Change
![]() |
| Alex Wolff of Nat and Alex Wolff, Brighton Music Hall, 2/24/12 |
Some pressures have eased, while others have not, but that's what keeps life interesting, isn't it?
Right now, the dripping faucet in my kitchen has morphed into a major plumbing project, there is an escaped gecko hiding somewhere in the house, and there's still never enough time/money/what-have-you.
Some things change, and some stay the same.
I started thinking about how things change when we took my daughter to her first concert last week. She's had a recent interest in Nat and Alex Wolff, formerly featured on Nickelodeon's "The Naked Brothers Band" several years ago. They're still young (14 and 17), but there's some definite musical talent there, and they certainly weren't hard to listen to, even for us chaperones. They also have a dedicated fan base, of which my daughter is one of the more enthusiastic.
The show was held in a small venue, a less overwhelming first concert experience for a twelve-year-old than one of the large stadiums the more "popular" acts could fill. It turned out to be a great show, and my daughter and her friend were among the many fans who had the opportunity to meet the boys, get autographs, and even have pictures taken with them. A terrific experience, all around.
It was interesting to me, though, to see that although the screeching "fan girl" attitude was much the same as it may have been when I was twelve or thirteen, some things have definitely changed. Instead of dancing and really getting into the music and the atmosphere as we used to back in the days of waving lighters, most of this audience was far more intent on taping/taking pictures with their phones (note the iphone in the foreground of the picture, above). I lost count of the number of phones held up in the sea of mostly pre-teen girls.
The performers had to encourage the audience to clap along (since, of course, phones had to be set aside to actually clap!). They were clearly an appreciative and excited audience, regardless, and I can understand why they were so determined to tape the performance; I can only imagine how excited I would have been to have had the opportunity to videotape Aerosmith or Bob Seger, or any of the other concerts I went to. Back then, it was "no cameras" for the most part. We all would have been thrilled to have something other than the old Polaroid Onestep (a bit too bulky to sneak into concerts!).
That's the way of most changes, I suppose. There are pros and cons, good parts and not so good parts.
My daughter and the rest of the audience that night may have seemed a bit less completely immersed in the experience than I might have been at that age, but they do have plenty of memories in pictures and video.
Maybe it's a good trade-off. Just as Nat and Alex have changed, evolving from those cute kids in that TV show to "real" musicians, everything needs to change and evolve eventually, and I suppose the concert experience is not immune. And in the end, this new generation doesn't know any different -- it's only us old folks who see it.
If they are missing out, they don't know it. And maybe that's just how it's supposed to be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

